The Origin Of Life Proves An Intelligent Creator.

 One must agree, that if we are to build a house, we must first have a foundation. The entire theory of evolution simply does not have a foundation. The best attempt at encountering this lack of understanding is the theory of abiogenesis. That is not biological evolution but the unfounded hypothesis of chemical evolution.

The truth is, if it happened once, why hasn't anyone been observed nor proven with the scientific evidence how life emerges from nonlife. They did an experiment and the closest they came to a cell, was the creation of amino acids. A minor component of what a cell is composed of.

This theory has been disposed of. The scientific evidence shows the early earth would not be conducive to the formation of amino acids. Scientists have tried to explain the problem away, by saying life must have come here through a comet or from outer space. Still doesn't explain how life starts, you're just ignoring the problem.

Let us dismantle this hypothesis. The first law of information is that information requires intelligence. The D.N.A. is composed of information, so much so, that it has roughly 3 billion that contain the information in your genes. That would take 10 encyclopedias or more, roughly a million pas.

Unless the laws of logic are wrong, the presence of D.N.A. requires intelligence. Even simple microbes like bacteria have D.N.A. It was disproven that we evolved from bacteria. So now they say it was a simpler more basic protocell. There is no proof of this whatsoever.

The D.N.A. not only is complex information but also has a mechanism for understanding the information. So what came first. R.N.A or D.N.A for a cell needs both to function. One with the information and another to decode it. 

This is called irreducible complexity, this goes against evolution theory. Some structures in life forms couldn't have evolved, because they need parts fully functional to be able to work. D.N.A. couldn't work independently of R.N.A. to claim they evolved is a logical fallacy.

In conclusion, the whole of the evolutionary idea's foundation is life starting on it own. We have eroded the foundation of this structure. Just like a building couldn't be functional without a foundation, evolution lacks that foundation.

Whatever or whoever has the genius to create this information is as complex as the human genome. Deserves nothing less, than the title of God. Till evolution can prove how it even started, the foundation is lacking. 

Back then they thought microbes just appeared in things like meat. The scientist Lous Pasteur disproved that life can just appear. It came from another source. Life begets life, that is why God is called the Author of life.

Since information requires intelligence either to understand it or even create it. It is rational that there was a mind behind it, this is God's work. Don't be deceived. I agree that animals adapt, which is microevolution but not that we evolved from bacteria that is improbable. That is macroevolution.

Even if given a billion years a bacteria cannot become a person. Each gives birth to its own kind, and all of this isn't probable if we can't prove how life started. The simple fact is that information requires intelligence, the fact that all life has codes of information logically means there is an intelligence behind it.